Can service members refuse presidential orders? It’s a question many Americans are asking as we watch Donald Trump speak as though the military owes him unquestioning loyalty; he has this idea that he can command the military to do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, and that service members are obligated to salute, obey, and fall in line.
As a 25-year Army Veteran, I swore an oath — the same oath every Soldier, Sailor, Airman, Marine, and Guardian takes — not to a man, not to a political party, but to the Constitution of the United States. That oath is the bedrock of our military. It is the promise that separates us from countries ruled by strongmen and dictators. So, let me be absolutely clear: not only do service members swear an oath to the Constitution and not to any president, but they are legally and morally obligated to refuse unlawful orders, even presidential, and not obey them.
This safeguard exists because our founders understood human nature and therefore structured our government in a way that was intended to prevent exactly the kind of authoritarian behavior we are now seeing. They knew that power attracts people who may try to use it for personal gain … or personal vengeance.
Our military’s power is deliberately limited, and the president’s authority is not absolute. The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the Constitution, and centuries of military tradition all say the same thing:
Obey lawful orders.
Refuse unlawful ones.
Always.
This is not optional. This is not political. This is the law.
In Take Back the Flag, I wrote:
“I’m worried that people no longer understand what it means to take and keep to an oath, or the importance of honor and character. I’m worried about the lies that I see being broadcasted throughout the country all for the benefit of those who wish to control others.” — Introduction
That concern feels more relevant every day.
A Pattern of Abusing Authority
We are watching Donald Trump behave as though the military exists to serve him personally, as opposed to serving the nation. He talks about “his generals,” issues threats of loyalty, and insists that opposition to him is unpatriotic. But that is exactly backward.
The military’s allegiance is to the Constitution, not the president occupying the Oval Office.
And yet, we’ve watched Trump push the boundaries of lawful authority again and again:
- Attempting to deploy troops domestically to quell protests — even though the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits presidents from using active-duty military forces for domestic policing except in very narrow, legally defined circumstances.
- Using federal forces in states without permission from those states.
- Ordering immigration enforcement actions that resulted in wrongful detentions and deportations without due process.
- Tearing families apart at the border in ways so cruel that federal courts ruled the actions unconstitutional.
- Punishing critics on official channels, which courts said violated the First Amendment.
- Giving favorable treatment to right-wing propaganda outlets while punishing legitimate journalists.
These actions reflect the mindset of someone who sees the Constitution as an obstacle — not a guiding principle.
Founders Feared This Exact Abuse of Power
In Take Back the Flag, I wrote:
“Our founding fathers established the Constitution because they wanted to form a more perfect union… They expressly fought against the authority and oppression of a single ruler.” — Chapter 2
They didn’t risk their lives so future Americans could obey a president like a monarch. They built checks, balances, and legal protections to prevent one person from controlling the military.
That’s why the military oath is crystal clear:
“I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States…”
Not the president.
Not a political party.
Not a personality cult.
“…against all enemies foreign and domestic.“
So Can Service Members Refuse Presidential Orders? Yes — And Sometimes They Must.
From day one, troops are trained to understand the difference between lawful and unlawful orders. The UCMJ requires service members to refuse orders that violate:
-
The Constitution
-
Federal law
-
International law
-
Human rights
-
Rules of engagement
This is not optional.
This is doctrine.
No president — not Trump, not Biden, not anyone — has the authority to override the Constitution or command troops to violate the law.
Trump Can Demand Loyalty All He Wants — The Military’s Loyalty Isn’t His to Claim
Trump can shout, threaten, and declare that the military must obey him. But the truth is defined in law and in tradition:
Service members obey the Constitution.
They obey lawful orders.
They refuse unlawful ones.
That is the backbone of American democracy.
Taking Back the Flag Means Taking Back the Truth
In the Introduction to my book, I wrote:
“The far-right extremists wear the flag as a suit of armor… as if they have some claim to it that denounces anyone else from seeing it as anything but what it truly is.” — Introduction
The flag is not a weapon.
The flag is not permission to abuse power.
The flag does not grant a president absolute authority.
The flag belongs to every American who understands the sacred weight of their oath — and who stands up for the Constitution, especially when it’s inconvenient.
So let’s be clear:
Yes — service members can refuse presidential orders.
When those orders violate the Constitution, they must.
Because…
The President does not have absolute authority.
The President cannot issue unlawful orders.
The President cannot direct the military to serve personal interests.
The military oath is to the Constitution.
The UCMJ protects service members from unlawful commands.
The people, not the president, hold ultimate sovereignty in this country.
If we want to preserve this democracy for the next generation, we must stand firm in that truth and — together — Take Back the Flag.